Skip to main content

Canada not getting behind 'premise' of South Africa's genocide case against Israel


Canada fully supports the International Court of Justice but that doesn't mean it supports the premise of South Africa's genocide case against Israel, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Friday.

On Thursday, South Africa launched a case at the top United Nations court arguing Israel's bombardment of Gaza and its siege on the Palestinians who live there "are genocidal in character."

Israel, a Jewish state founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust, has vehemently denied the allegations, and took the rare step of engaging with the court to defend its international reputation.

Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister Melanie Joly said in a written statement Friday afternoon that there is a high legal threshold for proving claims of genocide.

Neither Trudeau nor Joly were specific about what Canada will do if the International Court of Justice were to rule in favour of South Africa's claims, but Joly warned the case could provoke antisemitic acts.

Trudeau said Canada is continuing to follow the South Africa case closely.

"Canada is engaged in five cases at the ICJ because we believe in the importance of that as an institution," Trudeau said during a news conference Friday in Guelph, Ont.

"But our wholehearted support of the ICJ and its processes does not mean that we support the premise of the case brought forward by South Africa."

In a statement following Trudeau's remarks, Joly noted that the 1948 Genocide Convention defines the crime as intending to destroy a group in whole or in part, because of their nationality, ethnicity, race or religion.

"Meeting this high threshold requires compelling evidence," she wrote.

"We must ensure that the procedural steps in this case are not used to foster antisemitism and targeting of Jewish neighbourhoods, businesses, and individuals. At the same time, we will continue to stand against Islamophobia and anti-Arab sentiment."

South Africa has asked the international court to order Israel to halt its attacks, which began after Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel and took about 240 people, including some children, hostage on Oct. 7.

Israel responded with airstrikes and by restricting access to crucial supplies in the Hamas-controlled territory, where local authorities say more than 23,200 Palestinians have been killed.

About 100 hostages were released by Hamas during a temporary ceasefire in November, which ended when Israel accused Hamas of firing a rocket at Israel and breaking the ceasefire terms to release all the female hostages.

The United States issued a statement Wednesday that, like Canada, backs the "vital role" the International Court of Justice plays. But it went much further than Canada on this particular case, calling the claims Israel is committing genocide "unfounded." Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Tuesday the case is "meritless."

When asked if Canada would support the international court if it sides with South Africa, Trudeau said he supports the court's "important and rigorous work."

The National Council of Canadian Muslims said it was "beyond disappointed" with Trudeau's response, arguing it fell short of supporting the principles of humanitarianism and accountability.

"This signals a failure to support Canada's commitment to international law."

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs said it was glad to see Trudeau's initial statement, but had hoped Joly would have clearly rejected "the libellous genocide allegations against Israel."

Germany came out against South Africa's case on Friday, saying there is "no basis whatsoever" for an accusation of genocide against Israel. And media reports say a spokesperson for the British government told reporters the South African case was unjustifiable and wrong.

France has publicly said it would support the court's decision. The federal New Democrats had urged Canada to also take that stance and not intervene in opposition to the case.

Members of Trudeau's Liberal caucus have expressed a range of opinions on the issue, with some siding with South Africa and others with Israel.

On Friday, Montreal MP Anthony Housefather thanked Trudeau for his stance, noting both he and Toronto MP Marco Mendicino -- who was formerly the minister of public safety -- have said "the claim that Israel is committing genocide is baseless and unconscionable."

"Very pleased that Prime Minister Trudeau has made clear that Canada does not support the premise of South Africa's claim at the ICJ," Housefather wrote.

Ahead of Trudeau's Friday news conference, official Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre accused the prime minister of playing to both sides of the issue.

"He is telling whatever you want to hear, and then he is going to another group and saying exactly the opposite," Poilievre told reporters Friday in Winnipeg. The Conservative party opposes the case.

Poilievre said the case brought by South Africa is "shamelessly and dishonestly attacking the Jewish people and the Jewish state."

The top UN court, which rules on disputes between nations, has never adjudged a country to be responsible for genocide. The closest it came was in 2007 when it ruled that Serbia "violated the obligation to prevent genocide" in the July 1995 massacre by Bosnian Serb forces of more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys in the Bosnian enclave of Srebrenica.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 12, 2024.

-- With files from The Associated Press


Who is supporting, opposing new online harms bill?

Now that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's sweeping online harms legislation is before Parliament, allowing key stakeholders, major platforms, and Canadians with direct personal experience with abuse to dig in and see what's being proposed, reaction is streaming in. has rounded up reaction, and here's how Bill C-63 is going over.



opinion Don Martin: How a beer break may have doomed the carbon tax hike

When the Liberal government chopped a planned beer excise tax hike to two per cent from 4.5 per cent and froze future increases until after the next election, says political columnist Don Martin, it almost guaranteed a similar carbon tax move in the offing. Top Stories

How a DNA test solved the biggest mystery in one man's life

At 76 years old, Paul McLister learned the family he'd grown up with had kept a massive secret from him all his life. He also found answers to questions he'd pondered since childhood, and gained a whole new family — all because of a DNA test kit.

The shadow war between Iran and Israel has been exposed. What happens next?

Iran’s unprecedented attack on Israel early Sunday marked a change in approach for Tehran, which had relied on proxies across the Middle East since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October. All eyes are now on whether Israel chooses to take further military action, while Washington seeks diplomatic measures instead to ease regional tensions.

Local Spotlight

'It was surreal': Ontario mother gives birth to son on day of solar eclipse

For many, Monday's total solar eclipse will become a distant memory or collection of photos to scroll through in the years to come. But for Alannah Duarte and her family, they'll be reminded of the rare celestial event every year they celebrate their youngest son's birthday, as he was born on the day of the momentous occasion.

Stay Connected