Is she a murderer or was she framed? Things to know about the Boston-area trial of Karen Read

Latest details on Karen Read’s murder trial Closing arguments will be heard at the trial of Karen Read, who is accused of killing her officer boyfriend in 2022.

DEDHAM, Mass. — Did Karen Read kill her police officer boyfriend by slamming into him with her Lexus and then leaving him to die in a brewing snowstorm after a night out drinking?

Or did John O'Keefe get out of the SUV that night, join other officers at an after-hours gathering and get beaten up in a fight — only to have his body dumped outside in a panic before they framed Read for his murder?

Those are the questions a Massachusetts jury is deciding in a case that created a carnival atmosphere outside the courtroom, where a "sidewalk jury" of true crime bloggers and pink-shirted Read supporters have gathered each day since the trial began nearly two months ago. The jurors were sent home Thursday afternoon after a third day of deliberations.

Those involved

Read, 44, had worked as an equity analyst and was an adjunct lecturer in finance at her alma mater, Bentley University. O'Keefe, 46, was a 16-year veteran of the Boston Police Department. She often stayed at O'Keefe's house in suburban Canton, where the couple ended up at the home of another Boston Police officer, Brian Albert, after a night of bar-hopping in January 2022. A federal agent, Brian Higgins, also was among those at the gathering inside.

The charges

Read has been charged with second-degree murder, which in Massachusetts is punishable by life in prison with the possibility of parole. She also faces lesser charges of manslaughter while operating a vehicle under the influence, punishable by five to 20 years, and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death, punishable by up to 10 years.

The verdict slip

Defence lawyer Alan Jackson complained that a verdict form, or slip, was unfair because the offences included under manslaughter didn't include not-guilty options. Judge Beverly Cannone said this is how Massachusetts always does it.

"I don't really care how it always is in Massachusetts. I care about whether it's appropriate," Jackson said, adding that he'd use it for an appeal if Read is convicted. Read appeared to smirk as they argued, and her reaction caught the judge's attention: "Excuse me, this is funny, Ms. Read? All right, we're done," the judge snapped.

In the end, the judge changed the form to say "Not guilty of the offence charged 'or any lesser included offence."'

The evidence against Read

Pieces of Read's broken taillight were found at the scene and a single hair from O'Keefe was found on the rear bumper of Read's SUV. Prosecutors say that Read repeatedly said, "I hit him. I hit him. Oh my God, I hit him" to first responders and others. Prosecutors replayed angry voicemails Read left for O'Keefe, painting a picture of a failing relationship. They also questioned her behaviour, saying she never cried after O'Keefe's body was found.

Read's defence

Her defence is that the entire prosecution case is based on lies by officers sticking together to protect themselves. Her lawyers say the pieces of taillight and the hair were planted during the hours before the crime scene was secured. They suggested O'Keefe might have been beaten up by Higgins, who had flirted with Read over texts, and that the men panicked before trying to cover up the crime.

Sloppy detective work

Whether or not Read is found guilty, the case has shone a poor light on the techniques and actions of law enforcement officers, including Massachusetts State Trooper Michael Proctor, who was lead investigator despite having personal relationships with several of the people involved. Proctor called Read a "wack job" in texts, joked to supervisors about not finding nude photos of Read on her phone, and texted his sister that he wished Read would "kill herself." He called that a figure of speech and said emotions had gotten the better of him.

The defence pointed to conflicts of interest and sloppy policing — the crime scene was left unsecured for hours, the house wasn't searched, blood-stained snow was scooped up with red plastic drinking cups and a leaf blower was used to clear snow. Other suspicious actions included deleted search histories, destroyed phones and manipulated videos.

Growing attention

The case might have seemed open-and-shut, but as more evidence emerged, interest picked up among true crime fans and others with suspicions about the motives and actions of law enforcement. For more than a year, dozens of Read supporters have gathered outside the courthouse, calling for the charges to be dropped.

As jurors deliberate, members of this self-proclaimed "sidewalk jury" — wearing pink and waving American flags to symbolize what they call a fight for truth and justice — intently watch their phones for word of a verdict. Some take it further, including a man who dresses as the trial judge and a woman who wears plastic cups as earrings in a dig at what the defence called sloppy evidence-gathering. Their mood has been jubilant, encouraged by passing motorists who honked their horns.

Many were drawn to the case by Aidan Timothy Kearney, aka Turtleboy, whose website has relentlessly questioned the prosecution. He and other supporters have also been accused of harassing witnesses — Kearney was charged with witness intimidation and conspiracy, which he denies. They were ordered to remain 200 feet from the courthouse to protect jurors from any influence. Still, the crowds grow larger, to nearly 100. At one point Wednesday, some supporters said a verdict had come, prompting a mad dash toward the courthouse.