Parents of infant who died in wrong-way crash on Ontario's Hwy. 401 were in same vehicle
Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit has released new details about a wrong-way collision in Whitby on Monday night that claimed the lives of four people.
No one wants to run out of money before they die.
But making sure your nest egg will last is a challenge because you're dealing with a lot of unknowns: How long will you live? Will you face costly health crises? How will the market and the economy perform while you're in retirement?
That makes it difficult to figure out how much you can take every year from your portfolio and not outlive your money. But there are various rules of thumb to help you gauge a sustainable withdrawal rate.
These rules are typically derived from complex simulations based on historical returns, economic projections, and assumptions that you will live 30 years in retirement and have a balanced portfolio of either 50-50 or 60-40 stocks to bonds.
The end result should give you a very high probability (85 to 90 per cent) that you won't deplete your portfolio before you die. That means it won't go to zero. But it also means you could die with as much, if not more, money than you started with.
Keep in mind, though, any rule of thumb is simply a guidepost because the best answer for you will depend on your individual situation.
One rule is a "percent of portfolio" withdrawal strategy. You take 4 per cent or 5 per cent of your portfolio every year no matter what. You don't adjust for inflation or market performance. Say you choose 5 per cent and have a starting portfolio of $1 million. If the portfolio falls to $800,000, your annual withdrawal drops from $50,000 to $40,000. If the portfolio grows to $1.2 million, it increases from $50,000 to $60,000.
A more complicated but flexible strategy that might be easiest to employ if you're working with a financial adviser is called the "dynamic spending rule." Generally speaking you set a floor and a ceiling for your annual withdrawal rates based on the size of your portfolio when you start retirement and each subsequent year's withdrawal rate falls within that range on the basis of market performance.
Perhaps the best known rule of thumb is the "4 per cent rule" -- derived by financial adviser William Bengen in the mid-1990s, who subsequently revised his recommendation to 4.7 per cent. Based on the size of your portfolio when you retire, you withdraw 4 per cent of that total amount for the first year. So if you have $1 million, you withdraw $40,000. Then you adjust that amount for inflation in each subsequent year. If there's 3 per cent inflation, you withdraw $41,200 in Year 2. Then you adjust that amount for inflation in Year 3 and so on.
Given current market and economic conditions -- both stocks and bonds have been in bear market territory and inflation is high -- coupled with anticipation that market returns and economic growth may be more moderate in the next several decades, Morningstar and Vanguard suggest the 4 per cent level may now be too aggressive. A more sustainable withdrawal rate might be 3.3%, according to Morningstar, or between 2.8 per cent and 3.3 per cent according to Vanguard.
Bengen attributes the difference between his recommendation and Morningstar's partly to how long each assumes market returns will be tempered. Meanwhile, he's keeping an eye on inflation to see if he needs to rethink his 4.7 per cent recommendation.
"If inflation persists through the end of this decade at much higher levels, the 4.7 per cent rule might have to be adjusted," he told CNN Business. "Since the outcome is still in doubt, I recommend that folks adopt a more conservative withdrawal rate, perhaps 4.5 per cent, until this is all sorted out."
As you can see, there is no general consensus among financial experts on the best withdrawal rate to insure you don't run out of money but also have a good living standard in retirement.
With any of the strategies, you could die with $1 in your portfolio or $5 million. "It's like the cone of uncertainty in a hurricane," certified financial planner Mari Adam said. "Every year you have a certain amount of error."
A recent analysis by JPMorgan found that applying the 4 per cent rule to rolling 30-year historical periods since 1928, investors ended up with five times the amount of money they started with roughly a quarter of the time.
"This may be a positive outcome if an investor's goal is to leave a legacy. It may be a poor outcome if lifestyle sacrifices were made along the way to keep spending low relative to how the portfolio was performing over time," the bank's report said.
Adam has found that people either don't take out nearly enough, if anything, or they just blithely assume a withdrawal strategy of 10 per cent a year is a good strategy. (It is not, she noted.)
For her clients, she recalculates their withdrawal rates every year based on market performance and other factors. But for those not working with an adviser, she recommends keeping things very simple.
"I've never seen anyone go broke taking 5 per cent a year (and not adjusting for inflation)," she said.
Generally speaking she thinks the 4 per cent rule is a fair guardrail against people just taking what they feel like. But she doesn't recommend always adjusting for inflation.
"I'm as comfortable with that 4 per cent as any other number -- just don't bump it up by inflation without looking. If inflation is up 10 per cent this year and the market is down I wouldn't try to hold your spending to the same [inflation-adjusted] level."
What ultimately will make your retirement financially secure is not whether you withdraw 3, 4 or 5 per cent, Adam said. It's whether you use the levers at your disposal to lessen your need to drain your portfolio just to cover expenses. That could mean, for instance, retiring a little later, working part-time in retirement, delaying Social Security until age 70 or downsizing your home.
So, she added, don't sweat the withdrawal rate question too much. "If you live 30 years, [you can correct] if you take too much one year."
Ontario’s Special Investigations Unit has released new details about a wrong-way collision in Whitby on Monday night that claimed the lives of four people.
Three men in Quebec from the same family have fathered more than 600 children.
A British Columbia mayor has been censured by city council – stripping him of his travel and lobbying budgets and removing him from city committees – for allegedly distributing a book that questions the history of Indigenous residential schools in Canada.
A spike in impaired driving-related collisions has caused Ontario’s provincial police to begin enforcing mandatory alcohol screening (MAS) at all traffic stops in the Greater Toronto Area -- a move one civil rights group says is ‘not acceptable.’
William Nylander scored twice and Joseph Woll made 22 saves as the Toronto Maple Leafs downed the Boston Bruins 2-1 on Thursday to force Game 7 in their first-round series.
Jurors in the hush money trial of Donald Trump heard a recording Thursday of him discussing with his then-lawyer and personal fixer a plan to purchase the silence of a Playboy model who has said she had an affair with the former president.
Staff at a small southern Alberta office supply store were shocked to find someone had broken into the business last week, but they were even more confused when they discovered the culprit was a bear.
A federal judge on Thursday sentenced a scuba dive boat captain to four years in custody and three years supervised release for criminal negligence after 34 people died in a fire aboard the vessel.
Fake text message and email campaigns trying to get money and information out of unsuspecting Canadian taxpayers have started circulating, just months after the federal government rebranded the carbon tax rebate the Canada Carbon Rebate.
Three men in Quebec from the same family have fathered more than 600 children.
A group of SaskPower workers recently received special recognition at the legislature – for their efforts in repairing one of Saskatchewan's largest power plants after it was knocked offline for months following a serious flood last summer.
A police officer on Montreal's South Shore anonymously donated a kidney that wound up drastically changing the life of a schoolteacher living on dialysis.
Since 1932, Montreal's Henri Henri has been filled to the brim with every possible kind of hat, from newsboy caps to feathered fedoras.
Police in Oak Bay, B.C., had to close a stretch of road Sunday to help an elephant seal named Emerson get safely back into the water.
Out of more than 9,000 entries from over 2,000 breweries in 50 countries, a handful of B.C. brews landed on the podium at the World Beer Cup this week.
Raneem, 10, lives with a neurological condition and liver disease and needs Cholbam, a medication, for a longer and healthier life.
The lawyer for a residential school survivor leading a proposed class-action defamation lawsuit against the Catholic Church over residential schools says the court action is a last resort.
Mounties in Nanaimo, B.C., say two late-night revellers are lucky their allegedly drunken antics weren't reported to police after security cameras captured the men trying to steal a heavy sign from a downtown business.