Former child refugee Abdoul Abdi trying to skirt immigration process: lawyer

Review scheduled in Abdoul Abdi case A judicial review is scheduled the case of Abdoul Abdi, a former Somali child refugee fighting to stay in Canada.

HALIFAX -- A federal lawyer says a man who was a child refugee from Somalia when he first arrived in Nova Scotia is trying to get Canadian citizenship through the back door despite the fact he has been convicted of a violent crime and is facing possible deportation.

Melissa Grant, who represents the federal public safety minister, told a Federal Court hearing Tuesday that a decision by the Canada Border Services Agency to refer Abdoul Abdi to a deportation hearing should not be overturned by a judicial review.

"What the applicant is actually trying to do here is to seek a de facto grant of citizenship," Grant told Federal Court Judge Ann Marie McDonald, who later reserved her decision in the case.

Abdi, who was born in Saudi Arabia in 1993, lost his mother in a refugee camp when he was four and came to Canada with his sister and aunts two years later. He was taken into provincial care shortly after arriving in Nova Scotia.

He was moved 31 times between foster homes, but he was never granted citizenship while he was growing up in the province.

Abdi developed behavioural problems that advocates say were not adequately treated. Those issues led to problems with the justice system.

The border agency detained Abdi and referred him to a deportation hearing after he served about five years in prison for multiple offences including aggravated assault.

Abdi's lawyer, Benjamin Perryman, argued that the Canadian and Nova Scotia governments have failed his client, which is why Abdi should not face a deportation hearing.

"He would be a citizen, if he had been taken care of properly," Perryman said outside the Halifax courtroom.

Perryman told McDonald that the decision to send Abdi to a deportation hearing was unreasonable, unfair and contrary to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and international law.

Abdi did not attend the hearing. He is living and working in Toronto, which is in keeping with one of the conditions of his release.

Grant said the suggestion that Abdi's rights under the Charter and international law have been violated are premature and based on hypothetical harm.

"This is an administrative process that does not result in any change of status for the applicant," Grant told the court.

As well, she suggested that Abdi could seek a so-called danger opinion from immigration officials, which can be used to prevent refugees from being deported to unsafe countries.

However, Perryman challenged those assertions, saying immigration officials will have no choice but to send Abdi back to Somalia if the deportation hearing goes ahead. As for the danger opinion, he said such an assessment wouldn't take into account the challenges Abdi has faced in Canada.

Lawyers from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the non-profit advocacy group Justice for Children and Youth also made submissions to the court.

Abdi's case has prompted supporters to call on the Nova Scotia government to intervene on his behalf. As well, the high-profile case has sparked protests at events with federal leaders, including a town hall earlier this year with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in Lower Sackville, N.S.