Lawyers spar over what constitutes nuclear mine waste in Elliot Lake, Ont.

Elliot Lake residents get their day in court After a 3-year fight, a group of Elliot Lake residents will finally be getting their court over concerns about radon levels in their homes.

A federal court hearing Wednesday saw lawyers for Elliot Lake homeowners and the Attorney General of Canada argue over the definition of nuclear mine waste.

At issue are high levels of radon found in three homes in Elliot Lake, Ont., levels that far exceed safety guidelines for human health.

One resident involved in the case, Jennifer Carling, and her husband bought a house in the community and relocated from Toronto, Ont.

The couple was aware that naturally occurring radon levels were higher in Elliot Lake, which used to be home to a uranium mine.

But they were shocked when they had their property tested and it came back with a reading of 858.7 Becquerels per cubic metre, which is a measure of radioactivity.

Health Canada's guideline for radon exposure is only 200 Bq/m³. Another home involved in the case tested at 724.3 and another at 468.2.

The homeowners appealed to the Canada Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) to inspect their homes and order BHP, which now owns the former Rio Aglom mine, to remove the waste rock.

What isn’t in dispute is that the source of the radiation is rock waste from the former uranium mine that was used in the driveways and crawl spaces of the homes.

But in a June 2023 letter, the CNSC insisted that the rock was not mine waste under its definition, and therefore beyond its jurisdiction.

That’s because the rock used in the homes was separated from the ore and discarded before the uranium was processed.

The Canadian Environmental Law Association is appealing the CNSC’s decision on the homeowners’ behalf.

Lawyer Jacqueline Wilson told Federal Court Justice Ann Marie McDonald on Wednesday that the main purposes of the CNSC is to protect Canadians from the effects of mining nuclear material.

But now Wilson said the organization is trying to argue that rock taken from the mine site and dumped somewhere else is not their problem.

Such an interpretation would “undermine” the purpose of protecting the public from nuclear mine waste, she said.

'Perverse incentive'

Worse, it amounts to a “perverse incentive” for mining companies to move waste rock off-site to avoid regulations.

“The definition of mineralized waste rock says it has the potential to release substances that could jeopardize human health,” Wilsons said.

“The CNSC regulates mine waste rock at mine site, (but now it) argues its jurisdiction ends when mine waste is moved somewhere else.”

She said legislation prohibits companies from abandoning nuclear material. Since the waste rock used in the homes is considered nuclear material, it is under the CNSC’s jurisdiction and they should inspect the homes and order its removal.

But James Schneider, lawyer for the Federal Attorney General, told Justice McDonald that the CNSC’s decision is not reviewable.

But even if it was, Schneider said its jurisdiction does not include the type of waste rock used in the homes.

“It’s not associated with the production of nuclear energy,” he said.

“Not all uranium is a nuclear substance for this purpose.”

Must go through mining process

The CNSC is responsible only for rock waste that actually goes through the mining process, he said. Rock that hasn't been processed is considered to be in its natural state, and radon levels in natural rock are beyond their control.

“You’re not suggesting if there is nuclear material off-site of a mine, that it’s beyond regulatory authority?” McDonald asked.

“Expert reports say these rocks produce things that would fall within the nuclear substance definition.”

Schneider responded that if they were talking about something like mine tailings, it would be a different story.

“The CNSC’s position is that waste rock is not within the definition of a nuclear substance, even though it contains uranium,” he said.

“Rock that doesn’t enter the nuclear fuel cycle” and isn’t processed at the mine is not under the organization’s jurisdiction," he repeated.

Schneider said there are other organizations the homeowners can turn to, such as Health Canada and the Province of Ontario, which also regulate radon levels.

“The province is regulating (radon levels) there now” in Elliot Lake, he said.

Alternates to rock removal are the use of radon fans, which Schneider said “were found to be effective.”

“(But) these are steps the applicants would have to take themselves, on their own dime?” McDonald asked.

“Yes, your point is correct,” Schneider said.

The hearing resumes Thursday morning at 9:30.