Explainer on Alberta UCP legislature members facing recall petitions

Alberta Education Minister Demetrios Nicolaides was the first of what has now become nine United Conservative legislature members facing recall petitions from constituents. Nicolaides provides an update on teacher bargaining in Calgary, on Friday, Oct. 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

EDMONTON — Fourteen Alberta legislature members with Premier Danielle Smith’s United Conservative Party caucus are facing recall petitions from constituents.

It’s the first time the province’s Recall Act has been used on provincial politicians. It was brought in under former UCP premier Jason Kenney as a way to empower citizens and hold politicians accountable between general elections.

Under the legislation, a petitioner must submit a reason in 100 words or less about why they feel an MLA should be recalled. The person must live in the constituency and pay a $500 processing fee. There is no set criteria on what the reasons can be.

If the petition is approved by Elections Alberta, the applicant has 90 days to collect enough names from people in the constituency to trigger a vote. The number of signatures must be equal to 60 per cent of votes cast in the constituency in the 2023 election.

If enough signatures are collected and verified, a constituency-wide vote is held within four months to determine whether the MLA should be recalled. If more than half vote yes, the member is removed from the job and a byelection is held.

Here are the MLAs facing recalls, with portions of statements from the petitioners and responses from the politicians, posted by Elections Alberta:

Demetrios Nicolaides (Calgary-Bow)

Applicant Jennifer Yeremiy says Nicolaides has failed in his portfolio as education minister by prioritizing privatization at the expense of a public system struggling with inadequate funding and overcrowded classrooms. Nicolaides says recall petitions should be tied to a member’s core duties rather than “dissatisfaction with government policy” and that allowing the legislation to be used this way “undermines stable governance and the electoral process.”

Angela Pitt (Airdrie-East)

Applicant Derek Keenan says Pitt needs to be removed because she’s not communicating with and advocating for constituents while posting online “unfounded claims and divisive rhetoric.” Pitt says Keenan is exploiting his job as a school principal to launch a “politically motivated” attack.

Nolan Dyck (Grande Prairie)

Applicant Casey Klein says Dyck is representing his party rather than his constituents. “In meetings, he defends government decisions rather than listening,” she writes. Dyck says he has fought in the legislature for everything he promised to do. He says he met Klein in person in August and promptly responded to her emails, adding “I am fully committed to being accessible to all 46,000 constituents.”

Myles McDougall (Calgary-Fish Creek)

Applicant Serenity Shalev says the advanced education minister has ignored concerns of his constituents by overseeing budget cuts to post-secondary schools. Shalev says in supporting use of the notwithstanding clause to end a recent teachers strike, McDougall “shows that he’s not interested in upholding a democratic and legal government.” McDougall calls the petition “political games” and says he’s focused on working with constituents “and ensuring local voices are heard.”

Ric McIver (Calgary-Hays)

Applicant Oana Uritescu says McIver has failed constituents in his former role as municipal affairs minister by supporting legislation that “reduces local democratic control” while doing little to help the constituency with Infrastructure, education and other priorities. McIver says he has a track record of delivering for his riding and “this recall effort is not about my conduct; it’s a co-ordinated attempt to overturn democratic elections.”

Muhammad Yaseen (Calgary-North)

Applicant Siobhan Cooksley says Yaseen has been “unresponsive and disengaged” with constituents and has shown a disregard for public education and collective bargaining by voting to use the notwithstanding clause to end the teachers strike. Yaseen has not formally responded to Elections Alberta.

Rajan Sawhney (Calgary-North West)

Applicant Melissa Craig says Sawhney hasn’t responded to phone calls and emails and that her “actions in the legislature appear to prioritize party loyalty over the needs and interests of her constituents.” Sawhney has not formally responded to Elections Alberta.

R.J. Sigurdson (Highwood)

Applicant Molly Metcalf says Sigurdson doesn’t represent and work with constituents, doesn’t keep posted office hours, and doesn’t respond to phone calls or letters. She says he used the notwithstanding clause to remove the rights of teachers in the recent strike. Sigurdson says his notwithstanding vote was difficult but necessary to get students back to class. “The recall petition’s claim that I do not engage with constituents is simply not accurate,” Sigurdson writes.

Dale Nally (Morinville-St. Albert)

Applicant Joshua Eberhart says Nally hasn’t been listening to constituents and using the notwithstanding clause to end the teachers strike “reflects an overreach by the UCP government, of which Dale Nally is a part.” Nally says the petition is without merit, because he believes he’s being targeted by a “left-wing activist group weaponizing recall legislation to target UCP MLAs and provoke a general election.”

Glenn van Dijken (Athabasca-Barrhead-Westlock)

Applicant Aaron Conner says van Dijken is not responsive to constituents and disregards their concerns, adding, “he has placed toeing the party line above protecting the rights of his constituents.” Van Dijken, in response, lists projects he has helped with, including money for schools. The petitions, he says, are supposed to only be used for serious misconduct but are instead being weaponized by partisan activists.

Jackie Lovely (Camrose)

Applicant Theressa Hill says Lovely is not listening and has failed to stand up to program cuts or fought for education reforms. Hill says Lovely “has prioritized party loyalty over the needs and voices of her constituents.” Lovely says she stands by her voting record and says she works hard to keep in touch, adding “this summer I completed my 13th round of door-knocking across the constituency.”

Nathan Neudorf (Lethbridge East)

Applicant Ryan Tanner says Neudorf is not meeting the needs of constituents, citing “recent voting activity” but not specifying which votes. Tanner adds, “We need a leader who meets these responsibilities.” The utilities minister says he has been working to upgrade and deliver schools and find more doctors. Neudorf says the recall process is being misused for “ideological purposes,” given its intent was to address cases of serious misconduct.

Jason Stephan (Red Deer-South)

Applicant Nicole Green says Stephan does not respond to calls or emails, supports a separatist agenda, has disdain for French speakers and doesn’t take his duties seriously. Green adds, “His focus on divisive, party-driven issues instead of local priorities like affordability and health care also shows he is an ineffective MLA.” Stephan rejects the allegations, citing accomplishments as a legislature member, including money for post-secondary schools and health care. He adds, “Moreover, I have sought to, boldly and respectfully, speak the truth as I best understand it, even if some do not like it, seeking freedom and prosperity for Albertans.”

Searle Turton (Spruce Grove-Stony Plain)

Applicant Mona O’Neill says “time and again” Searle fails to respond to phone calls, emails or meaningfully address local concerns. O’Neill cites Searle’s lack of consultation before and after voting for the notwithstanding clause to end the teachers strike, calling it an indicator of his “unsatisfactory and apathetic job performance.” Turton did not submit a response to Elections Alberta.

RELATED STORIES:

• 9 of Premier Danielle Smith’s UCP legislature members now facing recall petitions
• Recall petition approved for 3rd Alberta legislature member
• Judicial review begins of proposed Alberta separation referendum question

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Nov. 24, 2025.