To amalgamate or not? Residents, politicians weigh in

Should the Region of Waterloo amalgamate? CTV’s Colton Wiens hears from local politicians on both sides of the issue.

The future of governance in Waterloo Region was up for discussion Thursday, as a provincial committee tasked with studying the matter stops in Kitchener.

Possible options include maintaining or modifying the current two-tier structure, amalgamating all three cities and four townships into one single city, or breaking them apart into standalone municipalities.

Twenty-two people signed up to speak to the committee at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Kitchener.

ARGUMENTS FOR AMALGAMATION

Among those advocating for amalgamation are regional councillors Jim Erb and Michael Harris.

“Waterloo Region has a population of 640,000 people, eight municipal councils, and 66 council positions. We are tripping over one another with elected municipal politicians,” Erb said in a written submission to the committee.

“As a reminder, and for the sake of comparison, with a population of approximately 515,000, the City of London has 16 council positions; the City of Hamilton, with a population of approximately 721,000, also has 16 council positions, and the City of Toronto, with a population of approximately 2.7 million, has 26 council positions.”

Harris shared similar sentiments, saying the current two-tier structure makes decision-making inefficient and slow.

“We are over governed and should be one municipality,” Harris told the committee, adding the majority of municipal services are already provided by the region.

Regional Chair Karen Redman also voiced support for centralizing more power within regional government, but stopped short of calling for amalgamation.

“Affordability depends on efficient service delivery in every corner of our Region. That is not happening right now,” she said in her submissions to the committee.

As an example, Redman said the Region of Waterloo is in charge of water supply and treatment, but the local municipalities oversee distribution of water and collection of wastewater.

“In simple terms, we provide the water, but five of our seven municipalities each build and operate their own individual pipe networks. That means developers have to deal with each municipality through individual permitting and servicing processes every time they try to build.”

MAYORS WANT MORE AUTONOMY WITHIN TWO-TIER SYSTEM

Meanwhile, in a joint news conference, the mayors of all but one of Waterloo Region’s townships and cities said they want more services, specifically those related to housing and development, transferred to their jurisdiction.

“In practical terms, the Region of Waterloo mayors support a reformed model of regional government where all existing municipal boundaries are maintained… and responsibility for services that directly support housing and development reside locally. These include all land use planning duties and local water and wastewater infrastructure,” Wilmot Mayor Natasha Salonen said.

She added the transfer of services to the local level could also include responsibility for roads, transportation, traffic control, culture, recreation, heritage, bylaw enforcement and, in the case of the townships, libraries.

Kitchener Mayor Berry Vrbanovic noted that together, he, along with the mayors of Wilmot, Wellesley, Cambridge, North Dumfries and Woolwich represent almost 80 per cent of the region’s population and they share a common vision.

“We believe we are ready and can assume these services with the associated budgets from the region and believe we can deliver them faster and better for our residents by eliminating duplication,” Vrbanovic said.

The mayors also want to see some planning responsibilities transferred from the region to the local municipalities with the goal of cutting red tape to get housing built more quickly.

The only mayor that did not join the unified front was Waterloo's Dorothy McCabe. She told CTV News she was never invited to that conversation but feels as the area grows, a one-tier government is the best approach.

“Climate change, hybrid work, economic development, talent attraction, all those challenges, what's the best governance structure we need in place to meet those challenges? I believe it's one municipality,” McCabe said.

MORE PRESENTATIONS TO COMMITTEE

Of the first two speakers who addressed the committee Thursday, one voiced support for amalgamation while the other wanted to see the province make Cambridge a separate city.

“We’re Waterloo Region, we have a reputation for innovating, for being agile and changing the game when things aren’t working, but when it comes to how we function as a government, we’re stagnant, unwilling to fix what’s broken, eager to maintain the status quo,” said Melissa Durrell, a business owner and former Waterloo councillor.

“I believe our success has not been because of our complex and fragmented bureaucracy, it’s been in spite of it.”

Cambridge Ward 8 city councillor Nicholas Ermeta told the committee he was speaking as a local resident, not a politician.

“Cambridge has a different culture than either Kitchener or Waterloo, we identify as Cambridge and there are many concerns in the community that regional policy has been slowly eroding our uniqueness and identity and residents do want the city to have a much greater say than it does now,” Ermeta said. “I believe we need more independence in order to move projects along quicker and better respond to the needs of residents.”

The committee meeting was scheduled to run until 6 p.m.

WHY IS THE PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT STUDYING THIS?

In September, Housing Minister Paul Calandra announced he was scrapping a plan by his predecessor Steve Clark to appoint facilitators to review six two-tier governments in the province, including Waterloo Region.

Instead Calandra charged the Committee on Heritage, Infrastructure and Cultural Policy to take over.

“The committee can carry out this work in a manner that is transparent, accountable and open to the public,” Calandra said in September.

He said the study should examine whether two-tier governments in those regions support or hinder the construction of new homes and whether certain services could be combined or moved from one level of government to another.

Since last week, the committee has been traveling across southern Ontario, stopping in St. Catharines, Burlington, Brampton, Ajax and Vaughan to hear from residents.