UN says the U.S. has ‘legal obligation’ to fund agencies after Trump withdraws from several

United National Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during an event to mark the end of the U.N. political mission, in Baghdad, Iraq, Saturday, Dec. 13, 2025. (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

NEW YORK — The top United Nations official on Thursday said the United States has a “legal obligation” to keep paying its dues that fund UN agencies after the White House announced that it is withdrawing support from more than 30 initiatives operated by the world body.

Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said he regretted U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to withdraw from 31 UN-related agencies, including the UN’s population agency and the UN treaty that establishes international climate negotiations. The U.S. will also depart from dozens of other global organizations or initiatives not affiliated with the UN.

“As we have consistently underscored, assessed contributions to the United Nations regular budget and peacekeeping budget, as approved by the General Assembly, are a legal obligation under the UN Charter for all Member States, including the United States,” Stephane Dujarric, a spokesperson for Guterres, said in a statement.

He added that despite the announcement, the UN entities targeted will keep doing their work: “The United Nations has a responsibility to deliver for those who depend on us.”

The strong retort from the UN comes after the world body has spent the better part of the past year in a somewhat hostile and fragile back-and-forth with U.S. officials, who, after Trump’s return to office, zeroed in on eliminating billions of dollars in aid and funding to international organizations like the UN and humanitarian assistance at large.

Through many conciliatory public and closed-door appeals, UN officials, including Guterres, had been able to convince Trump and his allies not to completely abandon the institution the U.S. helped found on the ashes of World War II, including through a US$2 billion agreement for humanitarian assistance announced last month. But America’s retreat had already influenced other Western countries, including France and the U.K., to reevaluate humanitarian funding, with many shifting that money toward military spending.

But Wednesday’s announcement surprised diplomats at the highest levels of the UN, who said they learned about the withdrawal through news reports and the White House social media. There has been no formal communication from the Trump administration outlining the decision, Dujarric told reporters.

Many UN officials refused to comment on the impact it would have on their agencies because they had not been given details or official word from anyone in the U.S. government.

Trump’s executive order

Following a yearlong review of participation in and funding for all international organizations, Trump signed an executive order suspending American support for 66 groups, agencies and commissions.

Many of the targets are UN-related agencies, commissions and advisory panels that focus on climate, labor, migration and other issues the Trump administration has categorized as catering to diversity and “woke” initiatives.

The administration previously suspended support for the World Health Organization, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees known as UNRWA, the UN Human Rights Council and the UN cultural agency UNESCO. It has taken a larger, a la carte approach to paying dues to the world body, picking which operations and agencies it believes align with Trump’s agenda and those that no longer serve U.S. interests.

Some of the agencies impacted, including the UN Population Fund, an organization that provides sexual and reproductive health services worldwide, have long been a lightning rod for Republican opposition, and Trump cut funding for it during his first term.

The withdrawal from the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNFCCC, came as less of a surprise as Trump and his allies had previously withdrawn U.S. support from other climate initiatives.

The 1992 agreement between 198 countries to financially support climate change activities in developing countries is the underlying treaty for the landmark Paris climate agreement. Trump withdrew from that agreement soon after returning to the White House.

Simon Stiell, UNFCCC executive secretary, warned the U.S. that the decision to pull back will harm “the US economy, jobs and living standards, as wildfires, floods, mega-storms and droughts get rapidly worse.”

“The doors remain open for the U.S. to reenter in the future, as it has in the past with the Paris Agreement,” he said in a statement. “Meanwhile, the size of the commercial opportunity in clean energy, climate resilience, and advanced electrotech remains too big for American investors and businesses to ignore.”

The U.S. contribution to the UN budget

The UN`s regular budget, which finances its day-to-day operations and primary activities, is funded by its 193 member nations, each paying a percentage based on the size of their economy. The U.S., the world’s largest economy, is supposed to pay 22 per cent, followed by China, with 20 per cent. There is a separate budget to fund the UN’s peacekeeping operations, where the U.S. is required to pay 25 per cent.

UN officials said the U.S. did not pay its annual contributions to the regular budget last year, an obligation outlined in the UN charter. The penalty for the U.S. not paying its dues is losing its vote in the General Assembly.

“The charter is not a la carte,” Dujarric said. “We’re not going to renegotiate the charter.”

Farnoush Amiri, The Associated Press