Reports of comments made by Jane Doe to Cornell University police in 2024 when she first went to school officials with allegations she was gang raped are raising new questions about what law enforcement knew at the time. CNN affiliate WCBS and ABC News reported they have obtained documents that detail comments made by Doe to investigators regarding the night of Oct. 19, 2024, when she was allegedly assaulted by multiple members of the school’s Chi Phi fraternity. She told police she was okay with an initial encounter, but that later in the night she did not consent and believed she was raped, WCBS reported, citing the documents. She also described being physically hit, the outlet reported. The revelations raise new questions as to why law enforcement did not file criminal charges at the time of the incident and what the district attorney’s office was aware of regarding the assault allegations, as calls grow for answers in light of Doe’s civil lawsuit filed this month. Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten said his office will be investigating the reported statements “fully.” As investigators reopen the case, here are the key questions that remain: What did Jane Doe tell Cornell police about that 2024 night? WCBS reports it obtained a transcript of Doe’s interview with Cornell University police in November 2024, weeks after the alleged rape, and ABC News reports it obtained a six-page written statement signed by Doe to Cornell University Police at the time. Doe described to Cornell police that she was heavily intoxicated on the night of the alleged rape, according to the WCBS and ABC reports, citing documents. The transcripts detail how she told police she was “pretty OK” with the initial sexual activity but did not consent to what occurred later in the night, according to WCBS. In the statement, Doe said she consented to some sexual acts but repeatedly refused some, including a foursome proposed by one of the fraternity brothers, according to ABC. She described thinking that if she passed out and the men had sex with her, they could be charged with “rape,” the only reference of rape mentioned in the document, ABC reported. In transcripts with police, Doe also described being physically hit, according to WCBS. She reportedly spoke to Cornell police on November 14 and 15, more than three weeks after the alleged gang rape. A campus police investigator led the questioning, with a Title IX investigator, a victim advocate, and Doe’s adviser also reportedly in the room for the first day of the interview, WCBS reported. CNN has reached out to Doe’s attorney. In a statement to CNN, Van Houten said his office was not provided the transcript and “will be investigating this fully and determining the truth.” “I will be looking into whether this is true and the specific circumstances of this allegation. I was not provided the transcript and the specific statement that has been attributed to Doe was not included in the written statement that I received from Cornell PD,” he told CNN. When asked about Van Houten’s response to the reports, a spokesperson for Cornell said: “The Cornell University Police Department investigated the matter in 2024 and shared all investigatory information with the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office, which is the established protocol if the department believes it is possible a crime has occurred,” repeating a statement made in an FAQs post the university released Tuesday night. The revelations put new scrutiny on why law enforcement did not file criminal charges when the incident happened. Van Houten told CNN earlier this week that the woman had not provided university police with the same information as what was alleged in the civil complaint released earlier this month. In a statement on Monday, Van Houten declined to release the full and complete original six-page statement signed by Doe to Cornell University police, due to privacy concerns. But he and his office did release a handful of excerpts, where she described the events of that night. The DA described those excerpts as “facts from Jane Doe’s statement that were relevant.” That 2024 statement had “described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual,” Van Houten said Monday, adding that her 2026 lawsuit “omits any reference that Jane Doe consented to the sexual contact.” The district attorney says it was this statement that determined no charges should be filed, adding “Multiple prosecutors and criminal investigators reviewed Jane Doe’s statement and correctly determined the alleged facts as set forth in the statement do not constitute a crime.” Doe’s attorney, Thomas P. Giuffra, told CNN on Monday the Cornell police report prepared after Doe gave her statement “is not materially different” from her statements in the lawsuit filed this month. “The legal complaint is much more detailed and lengthy because I took the time to meet with Ms. Doe multiple times and learn the specific facts of what had occurred,” Giuffra said. CNN has not seen Doe’s original six-page written statement or the transcript of her interview with Cornell police. CNN has asked Doe’s attorney and Cornell University police for a copy of her complete 2024 police statement and the transcript. How extensive was the 2024 investigation by Cornell police? Doe reported the incident to Cornell University police on November 8, 2024, according to the complaint. She was “traumatized, numb and unable to function or accept the horror of what had happened” in the days after the October 2024 assault, Giuffra told CNN. Doe reported the alleged assaults to police “once she was emotionally ready.” Cornell said Tuesday its police department investigated the incident in 2024, and “and shared all investigatory information with the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office, which is the established protocol if the department believes it is possible a crime has occurred.” It’s unclear how extensive that initial police investigation was, but Doe’s attorney says he believes it was inadequate. “It is challenging for me to understand how a thorough criminal investigation could have been conducted when she never spoke with anyone other than the officer who took her original complaint,” Giuffra said. “Other than her initial contact with Cornell police, she was not contacted by investigators from the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office or any investigators trained in interviewing rape survivors,” Giuffra said in a release. During a contentious interview Monday, CNN’s Jake Tapper pressed Van Houten on why there wasn’t a more expansive investigation from law enforcement or the DA’s office after the initial report was made in 2024. “We can’t change what happened in the past as much as the community is outraged,” Van Houten said. The district attorney also told Tapper that his team did not initially see the screenshots of a Snapchat group chat between Chi Pi members, which Van Houten said were “completely vulgar and disgusting, but they had nothing to do with her consent.” “They were not part of our initial analysis, but I understand that Cornell had them, and they sent them to our team,” he said. The university said Tuesday that Cornell police gave the DA the Snapchat screenshots in November 2024, along with the rest of the evidence it gathered. Giuffra’s characterization also raised questions as to why the nearby Ithaca Police Department was not involved in the investigation. IPD said Monday that it was “disturbed” to hear about the 2024 allegations, but noted it was not reported to the agency. The department said it only learned about the alleged incident recently through the media. The October 2024 incident occurred in Cornell police’s jurisdiction, according to the school, saying “the Cornell University Police Department is a sworn law enforcement agency and performs the same functions as municipal police, but on Cornell property.” What happened to the accused fraternity members? Doe’s attorney has said Cornell expelled two of the seven accused students while the others received lesser punishments, including suspensions, workshops or written assignments. But Cornell has countered that claim, saying there was a range of sanctions for the accused students, including suspensions and expulsions. “None of the individuals charged were offered the opportunity to write essays as a sole consequence of their involvement,” the university said. The university has declined to confirm the individual disciplinary outcomes, citing federal student privacy law. The school said violations of university policy “could lead to sanctions up to and including suspension or expulsion,” adding, “We will respond in detail through the legal process.” Those sanctions came after the university conducted a monthslong formal Title IX investigation, separate from the criminal proceeding by law enforcement, and a panel of trained faculty and staff heard evidence over multiple days, the school said. The school also said it had closed the chapter of the Chi Phi fraternity in 2024, and that the chapter remains barred from campus. It is unclear if any of the accused men are still Cornell students. Doe’s lawsuit faults Cornell for failing to properly discipline them after the assault, “all the while sheltering them from speaking to law enforcement, and silencing victims.” Cornell pointed to university resources available to survivors, adding, “individuals found responsible (for sexual misconduct) through our processes are held accountable.” “Any suggestion that the university did not impose consequential punishments for those involved is false,” Cornell said in an earlier release. “A continuation of the false narrative that there were minimal consequences in this case is irresponsible, will make survivors feel less safe and supported, and will perpetuate the underreporting of sexual assault.” But the lawsuit claims Cornell’s “conduct was so outrageous, shocking, despicable, and contemptible that it exceeds the reasonable bounds of decency as measured by what the average member of the community would tolerate and demonstrates an utter disregard for the consequences that would follow.” The complaint is seeking a jury trial to determine monetary damages. Who is Jane Doe? Doe has not been identified. It is common for New York courts to permit alleged sexual assault survivors to use pseudonyms when their privacy interests and risk of further harm outweigh the presumption of an open proceeding. Doe was 20 years old on October 19, 2024, the day of the incident, according to the complaint. Her attorney has said she is from a small town, and it was her dream to go to Cornell – which she no longer attends.
