Warning: Graphic content Tyler Robinson, the man accused of shooting and killing Charlie Kirk during a Turning Point USA event on a Utah university campus, is scheduled to stand trial for the conservative activist’s murder in the summer of 2028, a Utah judge said Monday. Jury selection will begin on June 21, 2028, Judge Tony Graf said. The judge’s decision comes after an October hearing where he heard arguments over the parties’ proposed trial timelines: Ahead of that hearing, Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, lambasted the defence request for jury selection to start in the second half of 2029, calling it “grossly out of line” and calling for the trial to be set for 2027. Prosecutors had asked for a January 2028 trial start. Graf effectively decided on a compromise and set aside 105 days to hear the case. In making his ruling, the judge said he considered the rights of both Robinson and Kirk’s widow. Kirk was speaking to a crowd at Utah Valley University in Orem when he was fatally shot on Sept. 10, 2025. Prosecutors have said they intend to seek the death penalty against Robinson, who is charged with aggravated murder, felony use of a firearm, committing a violent offense in the presence of a child, witness tampering and obstruction of justice. Robinson pleaded not guilty to the charges in September, following a lengthy preliminary hearing in July. Defence proposed tentative 2029 trial date Attorneys for Robinson had proposed a trial date in the third quarter of 2029 – but called that timeline “a necessarily speculative approximation.” They also proposed “quarterly hearings in 2027 and 2028 that are specifically devoted to assessment of the continuing viability of beginning trial during the third quarter of 2029,” a defence filing said. They needed that time, they argued in court, to conduct studies on potential “venue issues;” to wade through tens of thousands of pieces of evidence and litigate any discovery issues they may find, including possibly issuing motions to compel or subpoenas in order to gather additional evidence; and because all of Robinson’s attorneys have other high-profile cases they’re handling simultaneously. “The reality is, rushing to trial does not equal closure,” Robinson’s attorney Staci Visser argued. “It leads to mistakes… it leads to having to do this again.” Prosecutors, on the other hand, said they believed the trial could start much earlier, proposing a trial start date of January 31, 2028. They specified they could be ready to prosecute the case as soon as October 4, 2027, but said they did “not believe that it is wise to schedule the trial to span the worst of the winter season and the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays.” They reiterated that sentiment during the October hearing, with prosecutor Chad Grunander adding he didn’t want to lose a qualified juror because of childcare issues or because of inadvertent juror misconduct at holiday gatherings. Kirk’s widow called defence timeline ‘out of touch with reality’ An attorney for Erika Kirk filed a motion ahead of last month’s hearing asking Graf to schedule the proceedings “for the earliest practicable date in 2027” – the latest indication of the family’s desire to see the case resolved as quickly as possible. “Every additional day of delay carries the weight of all that Charlie’s murder has taken from his family, especially his two young children,” the filing said, emphasizing the defence timeline would see the trial begin four years after Kirk’s death. Erika Kirk’s attorney, Jeffrey Neiman, echoed that sentiment, telling the court in October, “You know who doesn’t get to spend time with their family over the holidays? Charlie.” The motion pointed to several other capital cases in Utah which proceeded to trial within six months to a couple of years, saying those display “how out of touch with reality the Defendant’s motion is.” Andi Babineau, CNN
