Skip to main content

Tom Mulcair: Stephen Harper clearly has a preferred candidate in the Conservative race

Share

Conservative skullduggery in booting out Patrick Brown as a candidate reflects very badly on a Party prone to lecturing others about probity, ethics and integrity.

Based on the single, untested word of a longtime party operative, Brown was given the heave-ho. Problem is, he landed on Jean Charest, whose chances of winning will go from slim to none if the Conservatives get away with it.

The people who made and profited from that decision were very much aware that what they were doing would effectively decide the outcome of the race. Pierre Poilièvre was being handed a victory not by Conservative members but by Party functionaries.

When you look at their connections to the Harper era, this whole manoeuvre appears even more troubling. The man overseeing the decision (and announcing it near midnight!) was Stephen Harper’s former Chief of Staff. Meanwhile, Harper’s former campaign manager is the senior adviser for Pierre Poilievre, the candidate who benefits most from the elimination of his only serious rivals.

‘HARPER CLEARLY HAS A PREFERRED CANDIDATE’

Party insiders with whom I’ve spoken are categorical: although he’s discreet about it, Harper clearly has a preferred candidate, Poilievre.

Harper has never tried to hide his dislike for Charest personally and politically. In the race that was ultimately won by Erin O’Toole, Charest had given serious thought to throwing his hat in the ring. He was so far along that path that he’d actually recorded political advertisements that became public.

In the end, there was the small matter of Charest still being under investigation by Quebec’s anti-corruption police that made running impossible for him. It did leak out, however, that Charest had tried to do the right thing and at least inform Harper of his designs. According to reports, it didn’t go well.

Political parties play an essential role in our system of government. Unlike the Americans, we don’t have a direct election for Prime Minister.

That job goes to the leader of the party with the most seats. That’s why leadership races are tightly controlled by Elections Canada. It’s also why the courts will move in and review sketchy decisions: political parties are not private associations. They are quasi-public. They give tax breaks to their donors. The public and our judicial system have a deep interest in keeping them on the straight and narrow.

‘JUDGES CAN’T ALWAYS LOOK BEHIND THE PARTY CURTAINS’

A few years back, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice issued an important ruling in a case that arose during the NDP race that was being held to replace me as leader. Mr. Justice Nordheimer stated that the decisions that political parties make in leadership races are subject to judicial review. The Party cannot simply ordain, by internal rules, that judges can’t look behind the party curtains.

There have been other cases since that have gone the other way. Notably, a leadership hopeful in a previous Conservative race, Brad Trost, lost his bid for review when the courts ruled that his relationship with the campaign organizing committee was contractual in nature. A Supreme Court decision dealing with a disciplinary decision by Jehovah’s Witnesses has also ruled that judicial review was restricted to actions of the State. Those cases could affect Brown’s chances here.

At the same time, Brown’s case is quite distinct from that of Trost and the religious organization. Here we are at the heart of our democratic institutions. The Trost case dealt with the leak of internal documents and the distinction with a religious organization is obvious. Brown’s case is about whether or not political parties can be judges in their own cases and whether leadership candidates have a right to be heard before being tossed, two fundamental aspects of natural Justice.

The State is present every step of the way in leadership contests, through the supervision and oversight of Elections Canada. Unlike Trost’s case, which was purely internal to the Party, Browń’s involves issues that are indeed the subject of State decision-making and Brown was turfed before Elections Canada made any kind of ruling in the matter. If Mr. Brown does get his day in court, the result will be of interest to all Canadians.

It’s worth quoting Justice Nordheimer:

“In this particular situation, the respondent (NDP) has embarked on a process to select their leader. That leader will be the person who will be put forward, by the respondent, to the citizens of this country as their candidate for the office of Prime Minister. Consequently, the decision of the respondent in selecting their leader carries with it some considerable importance for the voting public…Consequently the decisions of political parties do have a very serious and exceptional effect on the interests of every Canadian citizen. The voting public, therefore, has a very direct and significant interest in ensuring that the activities of political parties are carried out in a proper, open, and transparent manner.”

Transparent! Someone should explain the concept to the Conservative committee overseeing the leadership race. Their seriously divided vote, on the flimsiest of evidence, has never been explained plausibly.

That obligation for transparency is also worth bearing in mind when analyzing what we know so far about the decision to throw Brown out of the leadership race.

The Conservatives plead that they tried to “bring him into compliance” with the rules of Elections Canada. If a party discovers an illegality in a process under the jurisdiction of Elections Canada, their job is to see that it’s investigated, not to “bring it into compliance,” whatever that’s supposed to mean. If federal law has really been broken it should be prosecuted, not swept under the rug.

CHAREST’S ‘PATH TO VICTORY’

That leads inexorably to a question as to whether or not any law was actually broken. As one veteran political organizer said to me: “Hiring companies as vendors and having vendors pay staff is not illegal as long as the vendor is then paid by the campaign. It’s cash management.”

So why was Patrick Brown handed a capital sentence, without the right to be heard, by people with deep ties to Harper?

The answer can perhaps be found in a document that the Charest campaign circulated in the days prior to the Brown debacle.

That document was sent on July 4 and was entitled “Membership Update for Charest Supporters.”

It contains an optimistic but not entirely implausible analysis of a Charest “path to victory.”

Here’s some of what it says:

“450,000 Conservative member supporters are in less than 100 ridings making that vote extremely concentrated.

Of those, 20 ridings have a total of 100,000 members. This only equals 2,000 points.

In Quebec, the Party has sold 56K memberships. We are very confident we hold at least 80 per cent of the points distributed across all 78 ridings.

The interim list confirms, this is a horse race. We’ve said all along this is about points. The winning number is 16,901 and our data confirms Jean Charest is well positioned to achieve that…Jean Charest has a path to victory.”

WAS CHAREST THE REAL TARGET?

That was the real target of these shenanigans, not Patrick Brown but Jean Charest. As has always been their habit, the Harperites knew what they wanted - a Poilievre win - and they were going to get it, by hook or by crook.

Charest still has a “path to victory”? Destroy it…

Never explicitly stated, Charest’s only hope has always been to become the second choice of Patrick Brown’s voters. Those, his team hoped, could capture enough points in the Conservatives’ complex ranked ballot/100 point per riding system.

If Brown is no longer a candidate, it’s a pretty safe bet that many if not most of his supporters will simply not vote. Why bother? Charest’s hopes for second-place votes go down the tubes along with his “path to victory.”

The Harperites get a TKO against Charest, without ever publicly laying a glove on him.

They also get their wish: an ideologically pure Conservative Party that’s been kept free of the unholy influence of “Progressive” Conservatives.

Against that backdrop, Brown appears to have hired a legal A-team that should be giving fits to the Conservative apparatchiks who pulled off this crude stunt.

If indeed it does come to pass that Marie Henein gets to cross-examine the star witness of the Conservative Party, I’m going to try and get a front row seat. It’ll be the best show since Johnnie Cochran.

Tom Mulcair was the leader of the federal New Democratic Party of Canada between 2012 and 2017.

IN DEPTH

Who is supporting, opposing new online harms bill?

Now that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's sweeping online harms legislation is before Parliament, allowing key stakeholders, major platforms, and Canadians with direct personal experience with abuse to dig in and see what's being proposed, reaction is streaming in. CTVNews.ca has rounded up reaction, and here's how Bill C-63 is going over.

Opinion

opinion

opinion Don Martin: How a beer break may have doomed the carbon tax hike

When the Liberal government chopped a planned beer excise tax hike to two per cent from 4.5 per cent and froze future increases until after the next election, says political columnist Don Martin, it almost guaranteed a similar carbon tax move in the offing.

opinion

opinion Don Martin: ArriveCan debacle may be even worse than we know from auditor's report

It's been 22 years since a former auditor general blasted the Chretien government after it 'broke just about every rule in the book' in handing out private sector contracts in the sponsorship scandal. In his column for CTVNews.ca, Don Martin says the book has been broken anew with everything that went on behind the scenes of the 'dreaded' ArriveCan app.

CTVNews.ca Top Stories

Local Spotlight

Record-setting pop tab collection for Ontario boy

It started small with a little pop tab collection to simply raise some money for charity and help someone — but it didn’t take long for word to get out that 10-year-old Jace Weber from Mildmay, Ont. was quickly building up a large supply of aluminum pop tabs.

Stay Connected