Prying eyes: Neighbours win privacy feud with U.K. Tate Modern art gallery

The U.K. Supreme Court says people who live in glass houses have a right to privacy too.
The court ruled Wednesday that a viewing platform at London's Tate Modern art gallery made residents of glass-walled luxury apartments next door feel like animals in a zoo, and impeded "the ordinary use and enjoyment" of their homes.
The justices overturned earlier lower court rulings that sided with Tate Modern in the long-running privacy battle between the gallery -- one of London's biggest tourist attractions -- and residents of four apartments in the neighbouring Neo Bankside complex.
Justice George Leggatt said that the platform was visited by hundreds of thousands of people a year, who "frequently take photographs of the interiors of the flats and sometimes post them on social media."
"It is not difficult to imagine how oppressive living in such circumstances would feel for any ordinary person -- much like being on display in a zoo," he wrote in the court's majority ruling.
"It is beyond doubt that the viewing and photography which take place from the Tate's building cause a substantial interference with the ordinary use and enjoyment of the claimants' properties."
The court ruled that the gallery had violated "the common law of private nuisance." Three judges backed the majority decision and two dissented.
Tate Modern opened in 2000 in a former power station on the south bank of the River Thames. It helped transform the surrounding Bankside neighbourhood from a riverside backwater into an arts and nightlife hub dotted with luxury apartment towers.
The viewing terrace -- which has been closed since the coronavirus pandemic --is part of a pyramid-shaped extension that opened in 2016 at the gallery, which sees more than 5 million visitors a year. Neo Bankside was completed a few years earlier.
Lawyers for the residents argued the 10th-floor platform, which attracted more than half a million gallery visitors a year, constituted a "relentless" invasion of residents' privacy. They said gallery visitors subjected the apartments to "intense visual scrutiny," with some using binoculars and zoom lenses to get a better look.
The gallery said residents could solve the problem by drawing their blinds or putting up curtains -- and judges at the High Court and Court of Appeal agreed.
But the Supreme Court found that the viewing platform was an "abnormal" use of Tate Modern's land, and the beleaguered residents had a point.
"The claimants cannot be obliged to live behind net curtains or with their blinds drawn all day every day to protect themselves from the consequences of intrusion caused by the abnormal use which the Tate makes of its land," the judges said.
The ruling surprised many legal experts.
"Previous court decisions have suggested that if you happen to be overlooked by others, that is just bad luck and you don't have a legal remedy," said Richard Cressall, partner at law firm Gordons. "The Supreme Court has decided to put a cap on that."
Claire Lamkin, a real estate lawyer at Kingsley Napley, said that although the judges "emphasized the rare circumstances" of the case, "it will no doubt precipitate a wave of copycat cases where people feel a property development near them is highly intrusive."
The residents had asked for the gallery to shield their apartments from view, or to pay damages. The Supreme Court sent the case back to the High Court to decide on the appropriate remedy.
Natasha Rees, a lawyer for the five residents who launched the claim in 2018, said her clients "look forward to working with the Tate as valued neighbours to find a practical solution which protects all of their interests."
Tate Modern said in a statement that "as the case is ongoing, we cannot comment further."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
BREAKING | U.S. President Joe Biden touches down in Ottawa
U.S. President Joe Biden arrived in Ottawa Thursday evening for a whirlwind 27-hour visit expected to focus on both the friendly and thorny aspects of the Canada-U.S. relationship, including protectionism and migration on both sides of the border.

Trudeau, Biden could agree to end 'loophole' in Safe Third Country Agreement: CP source
Canada and the United States are negotiating a deal that could see asylum seekers turned back at irregular border crossings across the border, including Roxham Road in Quebec.
Opposition parties affirm call for interference inquiry, amid questions over MP Han Dong
Amid renewed questions over the pervasiveness of alleged interference by China in Canadian elections and affairs broadly, opposition MPs voted Thursday afternoon to affirm a parliamentary committee's call for the federal government to strike a public inquiry.
'Scream as loud as you can': 5 boys rescued from NYC tunnel
Five mischievous boys had to be rescued after they crawled through a storm drain tunnel in New York City and got lost, authorities said.
Asteroid to hurtle past Earth closer than the moon this weekend
An asteroid discovered just last week will pass closer to the Earth than the orbit of the moon this weekend, an occurrence so rare it happens only once in a decade, according to NASA.
Number of Canadians receiving EI at record lows, down 44 per cent from last year: StatCan
The number of Canadians receiving employment insurance benefits are at record lows and down 44 per cent from last year, new figures from Statistics Canada show.
Indigenous sisters developing video games to revitalize Mohawk language
Two Kanien'keha:ka (Mohawk) sisters from Montreal are on a mission that is close to their hearts: to save their ancestors' first language by developing video games young and old can play.
Here are the locations of the first 12 new Zellers stores
Zellers has opened the first of 25 new locations within Hudson's Bay stores across the country. The Canadian retail chain launched 12 stores in Ontario and Alberta Thursday, along with a new e-commerce website.
South Carolina's top accountant to resign after US$3.5-billion error
Embattled South Carolina Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom will resign next month after a US$3.5 billion accounting error in the year-end financial report he oversaw.