Prying eyes: Neighbours win privacy feud with U.K. Tate Modern art gallery

The U.K. Supreme Court says people who live in glass houses have a right to privacy too.
The court ruled Wednesday that a viewing platform at London's Tate Modern art gallery made residents of glass-walled luxury apartments next door feel like animals in a zoo, and impeded "the ordinary use and enjoyment" of their homes.
The justices overturned earlier lower court rulings that sided with Tate Modern in the long-running privacy battle between the gallery -- one of London's biggest tourist attractions -- and residents of four apartments in the neighbouring Neo Bankside complex.
Justice George Leggatt said that the platform was visited by hundreds of thousands of people a year, who "frequently take photographs of the interiors of the flats and sometimes post them on social media."
"It is not difficult to imagine how oppressive living in such circumstances would feel for any ordinary person -- much like being on display in a zoo," he wrote in the court's majority ruling.
"It is beyond doubt that the viewing and photography which take place from the Tate's building cause a substantial interference with the ordinary use and enjoyment of the claimants' properties."
The court ruled that the gallery had violated "the common law of private nuisance." Three judges backed the majority decision and two dissented.
Tate Modern opened in 2000 in a former power station on the south bank of the River Thames. It helped transform the surrounding Bankside neighbourhood from a riverside backwater into an arts and nightlife hub dotted with luxury apartment towers.
The viewing terrace -- which has been closed since the coronavirus pandemic --is part of a pyramid-shaped extension that opened in 2016 at the gallery, which sees more than 5 million visitors a year. Neo Bankside was completed a few years earlier.
Lawyers for the residents argued the 10th-floor platform, which attracted more than half a million gallery visitors a year, constituted a "relentless" invasion of residents' privacy. They said gallery visitors subjected the apartments to "intense visual scrutiny," with some using binoculars and zoom lenses to get a better look.
The gallery said residents could solve the problem by drawing their blinds or putting up curtains -- and judges at the High Court and Court of Appeal agreed.
But the Supreme Court found that the viewing platform was an "abnormal" use of Tate Modern's land, and the beleaguered residents had a point.
"The claimants cannot be obliged to live behind net curtains or with their blinds drawn all day every day to protect themselves from the consequences of intrusion caused by the abnormal use which the Tate makes of its land," the judges said.
The ruling surprised many legal experts.
"Previous court decisions have suggested that if you happen to be overlooked by others, that is just bad luck and you don't have a legal remedy," said Richard Cressall, partner at law firm Gordons. "The Supreme Court has decided to put a cap on that."
Claire Lamkin, a real estate lawyer at Kingsley Napley, said that although the judges "emphasized the rare circumstances" of the case, "it will no doubt precipitate a wave of copycat cases where people feel a property development near them is highly intrusive."
The residents had asked for the gallery to shield their apartments from view, or to pay damages. The Supreme Court sent the case back to the High Court to decide on the appropriate remedy.
Natasha Rees, a lawyer for the five residents who launched the claim in 2018, said her clients "look forward to working with the Tate as valued neighbours to find a practical solution which protects all of their interests."
Tate Modern said in a statement that "as the case is ongoing, we cannot comment further."
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
TREND LINE | Poilievre surpasses Trudeau when it comes to preferred prime minister: Nanos
The federal Liberals are trending downward on three key measures while Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has surpassed Prime Minister Justin Trudeau when it comes to the question of who Canadians would prefer now as their prime minister, according to Nanos Research.

BREAKING | Responding to Indigenous, Vatican rejects Discovery Doctrine
The Vatican on Thursday responded to Indigenous demands and formally repudiated the 'Doctrine of Discovery,' the theories backed by 15th-century 'papal bulls' that legitimized the colonial-era seizure of Native lands and form the basis of some property law today.
opinion | This is how much debt is normal for your age
Have you ever stopped to wonder how much debt is typical for your age?
'Leave this with me': Alberta premier heard on call with COVID-19 protester
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, in a leaked cellphone call, commiserated with a COVID-19 protester about his trial while divulging to him there was an internal dispute over how Crown prosecutors were handling COVID-19 cases.
As Canadians miss out on benefits, Ottawa promises automatic tax filing is on the way
The Canada Revenue Agency will pilot a new automatic system next year to help vulnerable Canadians who don't file their taxes get their benefits. This week's federal budget says the Canada Revenue Agency will also present a plan in 2024 to expand the service, following consultations with stakeholders and community organizations.
Silicon Valley Bank's chaos has been bittersweet for crypto and wine
Silicon Valley Bank's collapse earlier this month dealt a major blow to the wine and crypto firms that entrusted their money with and depended on the lender to stay afloat.
Canada makes amendments to foreign homebuyers ban – here's what they look like
Months after Canada's ban on foreign homebuyers took effect on Jan. 1, the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has made several amendments to the legislation allowing non-Canadians to purchase residential properties in certain circumstances.
'It's going to take the community': Yukon faces Canada's worst toxic drug death rate
When the doors close at night at the administration office at Yukon's Carcross Tagish First Nation, a van hits the road and drives through the communities to offer naloxone to reverse overdoses, drug testing kits, food and even a friendly face to help those struggling because of the opioid crisis.
What is the grocery rebate in federal budget 2023? Key questions, answered
To help offset rising living expenses, the Government of Canada has introduced a one-time grocery rebate for low- and modest-income Canadians. Here is what we know about the rebate.