What if Musk loses the Twitter case but defies the court?
Twitter wants a Delaware court to order Elon Musk to buy the social media service for US$44 billion, as he promised back in April. But what if a judge makes that ruling and Musk balks?
The Tesla billionaire's reputation for dismissing government pronouncements has some worried that he might flout an unfavourable ruling of the Delaware Court of Chancery, known for its handling of high-profile business disputes.
Musk hopes to win the case that's headed for an October trial. He's scheduled to be deposed by Twitter attorneys starting Thursday.
But the consequences of him losing badly -- either by an order of "specific performance" that forces him to complete the deal, or by walking away from Twitter but still coughing up a billion dollars or more for breach of contract -- has raised concerns about how the Delaware court would enforce its final ruling.
"The problem with specific performance, especially with Elon Musk, is that it's unclear whether the order of the court would be obeyed," retired Delaware Supreme Court Justice Carolyn Berger told CNBC in July. "And the courts in Delaware -- courts all over -- are very concerned about issuing a decision or issuing an order that then is ignored, flouted."
Berger, who was also a vice-chancellor of the Chancery Court in the 1980s and 1990s, stood by those concerns in an interview with The Associated Press but said she doubted the Delaware institution would go so far as to make him complete the deal.
"The court can impose sanctions and the court can kind of coerce Musk into taking over the company," she said. "But why would the court do that when what really is at stake is money?"
Berger said she expects Twitter to prevail, but said a less tumultuous remedy for the company and its shareholders would make Musk pay monetary damages. "The court doesn't want to be in a position to step in and essentially run this company," she said.
Musk and his lawyers didn't respond to requests for comment.
Other legal observers say such defiance is almost impossible to imagine, even from a famously combative personality such as Musk. He acknowledged he might lose in August in explaining why he suddenly sold nearly US$7 billion worth of Tesla shares.
"I take him at his word," said Ann Lipton, an associate law professor at Tulane University. "He wants to win. Maybe he's got his own judgment as to what the odds are. But he's also being sort of practical about this. He's getting some cash ready so he doesn't have to dump his Tesla shares if it turns out he is ordered to buy the company."
A ruling of specific performance could force Musk to pay up his US$33.5 billion personal stake in the deal; the price increases to $44 billion with promised financing from backers such as Morgan Stanley.
The Delaware court has powers to enforce its orders, and could appoint a receivership to seize some of Musk's assets, namely Tesla stock, if he doesn't comply, according to Tom Lin, a law professor at Temple University.
The court has made such moves before, such as in 2013 when it held Chinese company ZTS Digital Networks in contempt and appointed a receiver with power to seize its assets. But after coercive sanctions didn't work, the receiver asked the court five years later to issue bench warrants calling for the arrest of two senior executives the next time they visited the U.S.
Speculation that Musk could be threatened with jail time for failing to comply with a ruling is unrealistic, said Berger. "At least, not for the Court of Chancery," said the former judge. "That's not the way the court operates."
But more important, Lin said Musk's legal advisers will strongly urge him to comply with the rulings of a court that routinely takes cases involving Tesla and other firms incorporated in the state of Delaware.
"If you are an executive at a major American corporation incorporated in Delaware, it's very hard for you to do business and defy the chancery court's orders," Lin said.
Concerns about Musk's compliance derive from his past behaviour dealing with various arms of the government. In a long-running dispute with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, he was accused of defying a securities fraud settlement that required that his tweets be approved by a Tesla attorney before being published. He publicly feuded with California officials over whether Tesla's electric car factory should remain shut down during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
He's also taken a combative approach in Delaware Chancery Court, calling an opposing attorney a "bad human being" while defending Tesla's 2016 acquisition of SolarCity against a lawsuit that blamed Musk for a deal rife with conflicts of interest and broken promises. He and his lawyers have other Delaware cases still pending, including one involving his compensation package at Tesla.
"I think we've got a whole lot of players who, as loose a cannon as Elon Musk is, rely on the goodwill of the Delaware courts on an ongoing basis for their businesses," Lipton said.
Musk's argument for winning his latest Delaware case largely rests on his allegation that Twitter misrepresented how it measures the magnitude of "spam bot" accounts that are useless to advertisers. But most legal experts believe he faces an uphill battle in convincing Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the court's head judge who is presiding over the case, that something changed since the April merger agreement that justifies terminating the deal.
The trial begins Oct. 17 and whichever side loses can appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court, which is expected to act swiftly. Musk and Twitter could also settle the case before, during or after the trial, lawyers said.
Delaware's courts are well-respected in the business world and any move to flout them would be "shocking and unexpected," said Paul Regan, associate professor of Widener University's Delaware Law School who has practiced in Delaware courts since the 1980s. "If there was some kind of crisis like that, I think the reputational harm would be all on Musk, not the court."
National Bank of Canada raised its dividend as it reported its fourth-quarter profit fell four per cent compared with a year ago. The increased payment came as National Bank said it earned $738 million or $2.08 per diluted share for the quarter ended Oct. 31, down from $769 million or $2.17 per diluted share in the same quarter last year. Revenue totalled $2.33 billion, up from $2.21 billion a year earlier.
Royal Bank of Canada is taking measures to prepare for a more uncertain year ahead, but results from the past quarter still show gains in key areas like loans and new client additions.
With the 2023 post-secondary education application deadlines approaching, many students across Canada are looking for alternatives to university and college, leaving parents anxious taking a ‘gap year’ could mean they never return to school.
Wouldn't it be nice to never have to work again? While this may sound like a dream to many, it is entirely possible. CTVNews.ca personal finance contributor Christopher Liew shares a handful of helpful tips on how to potentially achieve financial independence.
Recent homebuyers with variable-rate mortgages will find the adjustment to higher interest rates more painful, said Bank of Canada senior deputy governor Carolyn Rogers.
Buying your first car can be as exciting as it is daunting. Whether you’re buying a car off the lot from a dealership or purchasing a car in a private sale, contributor Christopher Liew shares in an exclusive column for CTVNews.ca a few basic tips that you should always keep in mind.
In March 2022 alone, food banks across Canada had 1.5 million visits, a 15 per cent increase from the year prior and the highest recorded usage on record.
Many Canadians have one or two old credit cards that they no longer use. Before you jump to close your old, unused credit card, CTVNews.ca contributor Christopher Liew outlines some of the pros and cons of closing a credit card account, so you can make the most informed decision.